linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 01:14:55 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Cc:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
> >> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
> >> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
> >>
> >> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
> >> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
> >> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
> >>
> >> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
> >>
> > 
> > Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> > and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
> > 
> 
> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
> 
> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
> 
> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, for
> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@...nel.org.

It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
the two of you the primary contacts now.

	Arnd