lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:37:55 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Yong, Jonathan" <jonathan.yong@...el.com>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, qipeng.zha@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Correct iTCO Watchdog for Apollo Lake

On 06/22/2016 10:02 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:01:01PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 06/21/2016 09:53 PM, Yong, Jonathan wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2016 08:36, Yong, Jonathan wrote:
>>>> These patches fix the iTCO watchdog for Apollo Lake.
>>>> I changed the watchdog memory io to only use 4 bytes rather
>>>> the whole region, I'm not sure if that is the correct way.
>>>>
>>>> The previous 0x30h offset in intel_pmc_ipc.c was for based
>>>> on the earlier BXT-M platform. Apollo Lake has it at 0x40h.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if the patches need changes.
>>>> Please CC me as I am not subscribed, thanks.
>>>>
>>>> * Resent, typo in linux-kernel email address
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>      * Watchdog NO_REBOOT bit off-by-one corrected.
>>>>
>>>> Yong, Jonathan (2):
>>>>     watchdog: iTCO-wdt handle 5th variation for Apollo Lake
>>>>     x86: Fix Apollo Lake Watchdog address in PMC driver
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 10 ++++++----
>>>>    drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c          |  2 ++
>>>>    2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping.
>>>
>>>
>> Waiting for an Ack from Darren.
>
> Jonathan verified that the change will not break existing external platforms.
> I'm happy with it from that perspective.
>
> Guenter, will you take both patches together?
>

Yes, I'll add them to my queue of patches to send to Wim.

Thanks,
Guenter

> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ