linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for built-in or module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:39:29 -0400
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for
 built-in or module

Hello Paul,

On 07/14/2016 06:06 PM, Paul Moore wrote:

[snip]

> 
> I think it's a reasonable patch and I'm at that point in the day where
> I'm looking for distractions so I just added it to the selinux#next
> queue; once the merge window closes I'll rotate this into my next
> branch.
> 

Great, thanks a lot for your help.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America