linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.8-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:00:16 -0400
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, tautschn@...zon.co.uk,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild changes for v4.8-rc1

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The version with $SRCARCH is the correct version. (I think akpm may
> have picked up the v1, but Michal requested some changes that resulted
> in the v2 with the $SRCARCH correction.)

That's what I assumed, and that's the version I picked. There were
some other confusing changes in that area though, so I'd like the
involved people to give my resolution a second look, just to make sure
it's fine.

          Linus