[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:38:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Regulator probe
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:10:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:29 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > ...and then we correctly report that the optional supply that isn't
> > mapped (as far as I remember) isn't there.
> But it *will be* soon there.
> Hmm... And the proper fix for this case is... (let's assume there will
> not be device tree solution in nearest future)?
To supply this particular mapping before you set full constraints.
> If I remove has_full_constraints() call I will get EPROBE_DEFER on all
> optional regulators IIRC.
Yes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists