linux-kernel - Re: Regulator probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 09 Sep 2016 20:04:36 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Regulator probe

On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:10:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:29 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > ...and then we correctly report that the optional supply that
> > > isn't
> > > mapped (as far as I remember) isn't there.
> 
> > 
> > But it *will be* soon there.
> 
> > 
> > Hmm... And the proper fix for this case is... (let's assume there
> > will
> > not be device tree solution in nearest future)?
> 
> To supply this particular mapping before you set full constraints.

Thanks for patience and explanation. I will look later how to achieve
this.

> 
> > 
> > If I remove has_full_constraints() call I will get EPROBE_DEFER on
> > all
> > optional regulators IIRC.
> 
> Yes.

Which basically means that's not a solution I'm trying to get.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy