lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:26:54 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] AGPGART-UniNorth: Rename a jump label in
 uninorth_create_gatt_table()

>    drivers/char/agp/uninorth-agp.c: In function 'uninorth_create_gatt_table':
>>> drivers/char/agp/uninorth-agp.c:426:3: error: label 'enomem' used but not defined
>       goto enomem;
>       ^
> 
> vim +/enomem +426 drivers/char/agp/uninorth-agp.c

This error message points a glitch out which was triggered by my update suggestion.
Unfortunately, it means that the proposed renaming of such an identifier was incomplete
at this source code place.

In which ways would you like to improve the shown software situation?

* Would you like to fix a single identifier anyhow directly?

* Do you expect that I should resend a corrected patch series as a whole package?

* Would it be sufficient to send another update only for the software module
  "AGPGART-UniNorth" a bit later?

* Can I worry about this programming mistake a bit less just because
  the suggested renaming would eventually be rejected?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ