linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3) posix-timers: make it configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3) posix-timers: make it configurable

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, John Stultz wrote:

> > diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > index 62824f2fe4..62504a2c9f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> > @@ -195,3 +195,21 @@ config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> >
> >  endmenu
> >  endif
> > +
> > +config POSIX_TIMERS
> > +       bool "Posix Clocks & timers" if EMBEDDED
> > +       default y
> > +       help
> > +         This includes native support for POSIX timers to the kernel.
> > +         Most embedded systems may have no use for them and therefore they
> > +         can be configured out to reduce the size of the kernel image.
> > +
> > +         When this option is disabled, the following syscalls won't be
> > +         available: timer_create, timer_gettime: timer_getoverrun,
> > +         timer_settime, timer_delete, clock_adjtime. Furthermore, the
> > +         clock_settime, clock_gettime, clock_getres and clock_nanosleep
> > +         syscalls will be limited to CLOCK_REALTIME and CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> > +         only.
> > +
> > +         If unsure say y.
> >
> 
> One thought.. Should this go under:
>     Configure standard kernel features (expert users)
> rather then a top level item under  General Setup ?

Hmmm... probably yes.

Do you need that I repost the patch?


Nicolas