linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: android: ion: Remove explicit NULL comparison using Coccinelle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 2 Oct 2016 17:37:51 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com>
Cc:     labbott@...hat.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        arve@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: android: ion: Remove explicit NULL
 comparison using Coccinelle

On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 08:51:29PM +0530, Shyam Saini wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 16:58 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:58:51PM +0530, shyam saini wrote:
> > > 
> > > Remove the explicit NULL comparison and rewrite in a compact form.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: shyam saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_of.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Does not apply to my tree :(
> 
> 
> Do I need to rebase it? Because I have already included all the
> maintainers in the patch which I got from  scripts/get_maintainer.pl.

If you want it applied, yes, you need to rebase it.  Listing the
maintainers doesn't help the patch to somehow magically be able to be
applied to the tree :)

Please work against my staging-testing branch of the staging.git tree,
as it has a lot of patches I just accepted in it that are not yet in
linux-next.

thanks,

greg k-h