lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:02:20 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
        "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:     "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver

On 2016-11-10 13:56, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Rosin [mailto:peda@...ntia.se]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:13 PM
>> To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>; wsa@...-dreams.de
>> Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; jiri@...nulli.us;
>> Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>
>> Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver
>>
>> [resend to all, got the wrong button, sorry]
>>
>> On 2016-11-10 11:42, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2016-11-03 06:20, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I see that this patch has not been picked-up yet for i2c-next.
>>>> Is it possible it was missed from some reason?
>>>
>>> Yes, apparently, really sorry about that!
>>>
>>> I'll put it in a branch and make a pull request for Wolfram (but that
>>> is a bit new for me, we'll see how it goes).
>>
>> But now that I looked again, I noticed that the source is dual licensed and yet
>> your MODULE_LICENSE tag says only "GPL v2". I.e. the same issue your i2c
>> master driver had that Vladimir Zapolskiy noticed.
>>
>> Please fix this, and it might be a good idea to take a look in your other drivers as
>> well in case you have further problems in this department...
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Thank you for reply. 
> I'll re-submit it from the current i2c next branch.
> Since I'll fix the license, I guess I should issue it as "patch v6". Right?

Sounds right, yes.

Cheers,
Peter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ