linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF graph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:23:13 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Cc:     Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@...sung.com>, inki.dae@...sung.com,
        jy0922.shim@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
        kgene@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        javier@....samsung.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Fix the parse_dt of exynos dsi and remove the OF
 graph

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:22:06AM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Hoegeun,
> 
> > Hoegeun Kwon (7):
> >   arm64: dts: exynos: Add the burst and esc clock frequency properties
> >     for exynos5433 dts
> >   arm: dts: Add the burst and esc clock frequency properties for
> >     exynos3250 dts
> >   arm: dts: Add the burst and esc clock frequency properties for
> >     exynos4412 dts
> >   arm: dts: Add the burst and esc clock frequency properties for
> >     exynos4210 dts
> >   drm/exynos: dsi: Fix the parse_dt function
> >   arm64: dts: exynos: Remove the OF graph from DSI node
> >   arm: dts: Remove the OF graph from DSI node
> 
> for all of them:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>

Andi,

Thanks for review. It is much welcomed.

I am trying not loose such review tags but it might happen because:
1. Patchwork does not store them,
2. Mail does not sit in inbox for long (inbox zero),
so if it is possible the most convenient for me is to reply with review
to each email.

> 
> although I would have squashed patch 2, 3 and 4, but no need to
> resend, unless someone else agrees.

Yes, these are small additions to the same arch so they could be
indeed squashed. I don't mind keeping them separated though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof