linux-kernel - Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:52:05 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:     mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on
 nohz_full CPUs

Hi Ingo,

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:11:53AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Commit-ID:  387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> Author:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:12:02 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:30:02 +0200
> 
> sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs

Thanks for applying the series! The two other patches are indeed good but
Rik and Mike have mitigated feelings about this very patch. I think we need to decouple
housekeeping from nohz_full before applying it. Is it possible to set it aside
for now?

Thanks!