linux-kernel - Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:47:47 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        riel@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on
 nohz_full CPUs


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:11:53AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Commit-ID:  387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> > Author:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:12:02 +0200
> > Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:30:02 +0200
> > 
> > sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs
> 
> Thanks for applying the series! The two other patches are indeed good but
> Rik and Mike have mitigated feelings about this very patch. I think we need to decouple
> housekeeping from nohz_full before applying it. Is it possible to set it aside
> for now?

Well, if patches are forthcoming and the commit isn't buggy per se, we could have 
it with the note of it being improved further.

Thanks,

	Ingo