linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v8 4/7] of/irq: Adjust of pci irq parsing for multiple interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:05:03 +0800
From:   jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 4/7] of/irq: Adjust of pci irq parsing for multiple
 interrupts

Hi Rob,

On 10/27/2017 04:02 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Why do you need this patch? You're moving the wakeup handling from the
> PCI device to the bridge. The bridge device is not PCI interrupts, but
> a platform device so this function doesn't matter.
>

because it's possible we have multiple PCI devices with individual WAKE# 
interrupt.

so Brian suggested we may need to support both of PCI device wakeup 
handling and the bridge wakeup handling in the pci core(as the ACPI) :)

> Rob
>
>
>