Date:   Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:56:56 +0100
From:   Ywe Cærlyn <ywe@...ranet.life>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of
 "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip.

Den 11/12/2017 11:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in 
>>>>>>>>>> operation. Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short 
>>>>>>>>>> buffers, lowest latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, 
>>>>>>>>>> max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have 
>>>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
>>>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open 
>>>>>> source", and "free software" to "Available Source". It is 
>>>>>> repeated a lot, and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not 
>>>>>> speak of avoiding uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). 
>>>>>> This is also based on on my conclusion on philosophy research 
>>>>>> over 15 years, and that things need to be right. And even 
>>>>>> metaphysically. For Success. I also CC Richard Stallman on this, 
>>>>>> maybe GNU4.0 will make considerations for this. The hacker will 
>>>>>> now not only be free, but make money. ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>>>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
>>>>> consider    ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
>>>>> enemies,     ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
>>>>> example. ]]]|
>>>>> |
>>>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux. If you call
>>>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>>>>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>>>>> |give us equal mention.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |--
>>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>> And-
>>>>>
>>>>> |
>>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please 
>>>>> consider    ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all 
>>>>> enemies,     ]]]
>>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's 
>>>>> example. ]]]
>>>>> |
>>>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>>>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>>>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>>>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>>>>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>>>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>>>>> |
>>>>> |
>>>>> |--
>>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>>>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue 
>>>>> of finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed 
>>>>> succeed if it chokes its own success?
>>>>>
>>>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
>>>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier 
>>>>> and god, he slaves to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>>>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
>>>>> decision?
>>>>>
>>>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to 
>>>>> PC C, and the original unix hacking?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am 
>>>> going to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>>>>
>>>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
>>>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
>>>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
>>>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
>>>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution 
>>>> with similar sound of input and output.
>>>>
>>>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>>>>
>>>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
>>>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>>>>
>>>> Peace.
>>>
>>> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
>>> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
>>>
>>> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
>>> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying 
>>> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, 
>>> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And 
>>> minimal jitter programming.
>>>
>>> So bye for now.
>>>
>> Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
>>
>> So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of 
>> OpenBSD seems to be more like me.
>> Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and 
>> if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented 
>> that at all, and is an enemy of this.
>> So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
>> "Unnud Oddox be with you".
>>
>>
>>
> It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of 
> "GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality 
> of Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is 
> ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the 
> three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, 
> "Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.
>
> I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be 
> obtained from me, if wanted: 
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>
> And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an 
> Ultranet, a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.
>
>
> Peaceful Saluations.
>
>
>
Btw, Stallmans own "LIbre"-tweak seems to be going in the same 
direction. However as long as GNU really is based on an illegal rip of 
Unix, where he is the frontman, a complete correction is really going to 
a legal fork of Unix, like OpenBSD. Or it still really is just as dodgy 
as Microsofts MS-DOS rip.

My about page is now up on ultranet. http://www.ultranet.life/author-info/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists