linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: add eeprom "at24,no-read-rollover" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:06:08 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>, mark.rutland@....com,
        wsa@...-dreams.de, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        nsekhar@...com, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, javier@...hile0.org,
        divagar.mohandass@...el.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: add eeprom "at24,no-read-rollover" property

> at24 is not a vendor prefix. Either this is atmel specific and you want
> atmel,no-read-rollover or it is for all vendors at24 compatible eeproms
> and you want at24-no-read-rollover. Or just drop the at24 if this
> binding is in fact for just at24 eeproms as none of the other properties
> has at24 in them.

Bartosz, shall I rename
at24,no-read-rollover -> no-read-rollover ?