linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: add eeprom "at24,no-read-rollover" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:21:54 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, nsekhar@...com,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
        Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohandass@...el.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: add eeprom "at24,no-read-rollover" property

2017-12-07 15:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>:
>> at24 is not a vendor prefix. Either this is atmel specific and you want
>> atmel,no-read-rollover or it is for all vendors at24 compatible eeproms
>> and you want at24-no-read-rollover. Or just drop the at24 if this
>> binding is in fact for just at24 eeproms as none of the other properties
>> has at24 in them.
>
> Bartosz, shall I rename
> at24,no-read-rollover -> no-read-rollover ?

Yes, please.

Thanks,
Bartosz