linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:30:08 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] dt-bindings: sound: add motorola,cpcap-audio-codec

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:07:38PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:

> +&cpcap {
> +	audio-codec {
> +		compatible = "motorola,cpcap-audio-codec";
> +	};

Why are we adding a separate DT node with no content for this?  This is
a single chip, we already know that the CODEC part is there from the DT
telling us that the chip is there and what we decide is part of the
CODEC is going to depend on what the OS running on the system is doing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)