linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][ACPI-next] ACPI: battery: make function __battery_hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:44:36 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ACPI-next] ACPI: battery: make function __battery_hook_unregister static

On Friday, February 23, 2018 5:32:55 PM CET Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The function __battery_hook_unregister is local to the source and does
> not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> drivers/acpi/battery.c:654:6: warning: symbol '__battery_hook_unregister'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index cfdef4c1d097..b4580b2e8706 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_battery_list);
>  static LIST_HEAD(battery_hook_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(hook_mutex);
>  
> -void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
> +static void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_battery *battery;
>  	/*
> 

Applied, thanks!