linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 [RESEND] 2/2] dt-bindings: introduce Command DB for QCOM SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:10:36 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 [RESEND] 2/2] dt-bindings: introduce Command DB for
 QCOM SoCs

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:16:42PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Lina Iyer (2018-04-06 08:13:56)
> > From: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@...eaurora.org>
> > 
> > Command DB provides information on shared resources like clocks,
> > regulators etc., probed at boot by the remote subsytem and made
> > available in shared memory.
> > 
> > Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> 
> > +       reserved-memory {
> > +               [...]
> > +               qcom,cmd-db@...e0000 {
> 
> Nitpick: This may want to be called 'memory@...e0000' because we prefer
> generic node names.

Well, "memory" is for nodes of memory that aren't reserved. So 
"reserved-memory@..." would be better.

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>