linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 16:31:10 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>>
>>> V5:
>>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7.
>>
>> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch
>> set and not too much for you to rebase.
>
> thanks!
>
> Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending...
>
>>
>> It's fine to just resend the rest next time.
>
> There is only one point open before resending:
>
> what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK?
>
> * GENMASK(4, 0)
> * or 0x1f

No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver
contributors are most convenient with.

Yours,
Linus Walleij