linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 16:37:23 +0200
From:   "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Discussions about the Letux Kernel 
        <letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver


> Am 16.05.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>>> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> V5:
>>>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7.
>>> 
>>> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch
>>> set and not too much for you to rebase.
>> 
>> thanks!
>> 
>> Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending...
>> 
>>> 
>>> It's fine to just resend the rest next time.
>> 
>> There is only one point open before resending:
>> 
>> what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK?
>> 
>> * GENMASK(4, 0)
>> * or 0x1f
> 
> No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver
> contributors are most convenient with.

Ok, then let's keep the GENMASK(4, 0) since nobody did complain
about it.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus