linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ti-cpufreq: minor fixes/cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 22:19:58 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ti-cpufreq: minor fixes/cleanups

On Friday, May 18, 2018 5:07:12 PM CEST Suman Anna wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 11:49 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > Hi Viresh,
> > 
> > Please find the updated series replacing the previous patch [1] fixing
> > couple of issues in the TI CPUFreq driver. I have split up the patches
> > as per your comments on v1. Final code diff remains the same as before.
> > 
> > regards
> > Suman
> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10308925/
> > 
> > Suman Anna (2):
> >   cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Fix an incorrect error return value
> >   cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Use devres managed API in probe()
> 
> Gentle reminder, I don't see these patches in -next. Who is picking up
> these patches?

You need to resend them I'm afraid, with any tags received so far.

And they won't be picked up if you don't CC linux-pm@...r.kernel.org on
the submission.

Thanks,
Rafael