linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ti-cpufreq: minor fixes/cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 17:29:01 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ti-cpufreq: minor fixes/cleanups

Hi Rafael,

On 05/18/2018 03:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 18, 2018 5:07:12 PM CEST Suman Anna wrote:
>> On 04/02/2018 11:49 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> Hi Viresh,
>>>
>>> Please find the updated series replacing the previous patch [1] fixing
>>> couple of issues in the TI CPUFreq driver. I have split up the patches
>>> as per your comments on v1. Final code diff remains the same as before.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Suman
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10308925/
>>>
>>> Suman Anna (2):
>>>   cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Fix an incorrect error return value
>>>   cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Use devres managed API in probe()
>>
>> Gentle reminder, I don't see these patches in -next. Who is picking up
>> these patches?
> 
> You need to resend them I'm afraid, with any tags received so far.
> 
> And they won't be picked up if you don't CC linux-pm@...r.kernel.org on
> the submission.

Sorry for the delay, I have reposted the series with all the tags picked
up and CCing the linux-pm list.

regards
Suman