[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:23:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"open list:POWER MANAGEMENT CORE" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] powercap/drivers/idle_injection: Add an idle
injection framework
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:16:40AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> + atomic_t idle_duration_ms;
> + atomic_t run_duration_ms;
> + idle_duration_ms = atomic_read(&ii_dev->idle_duration_ms);
> + run_duration_ms = atomic_read(&ii_dev->run_duration_ms);
> + atomic_set(&ii_dev->run_duration_ms, run_duration_ms);
> + atomic_set(&ii_dev->idle_duration_ms, idle_duration_ms);
> + *run_duration_ms = atomic_read(&ii_dev->run_duration_ms);
> + *idle_duration_ms = atomic_read(&ii_dev->idle_duration_ms);
> + if (!atomic_read(&ii_dev->idle_duration_ms))
> + if (!atomic_read(&ii_dev->run_duration_ms))
What is the point of atomic_t here ?!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists