[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 18:03:17 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: sca3000: Mark expected switch fall-through
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:39:34 -0500
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Looks like a bug to me not an unmarked fall through.
Should be return ret;
Do you want to do the patch?
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> index 4dceb75..209b52a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> @@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ static int sca3000_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> ret = sca3000_write_3db_freq(st, val);
> mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists