[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:28:50 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, palmer@...ive.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] gpio: sifive: Add GPIO driver for SiFive SoCs
On Okt 10 2018, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:01:29PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Okt 09 2018, Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
>>
>> > +static void sifive_set_ie(struct sifive_gpio *chip, unsigned int offset)
>> > +{
>> > + unsigned long flags;
>> > + unsigned int trigger;
>> > +
>> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->lock, flags);
>> > + trigger = (chip->enabled & BIT(offset)) ? chip->trigger[offset] : 0;
>>
>> This should use test_bit instead.
>
> Given that this apparently needs the spinlock for atomciy with more than
> just the bitmap test_bit would be rather pointless.
BIT and test_bit/assign_bit are not compatible.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists