lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 13 Oct 2018 18:23:50 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     wzabolot@...ktron.elka.pw.edu.pl
Cc:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, wzab@....pw.edu.pl,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug introduced in the of_get_named_gpiod_flags function.

On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 5:53 PM wzabolot@...ktron.elka.pw.edu.pl
<wzabolot@...ktron.elka.pw.edu.pl> wrote:

> The question is, if there may be any other in-tree GPIO controller
> driver that does not initialize those flags?

So as I said, I looked over them and they all initialize
their flags.

> Anyway the current situation is somehow dangerous.

Not very dangerous compared to much other kernel code.

> Maybe the best solution would be to initialize the automatic variable in
> the of_find_gpio?

Patches welcom, make sure they are tested with mainline
code and drivers.

Yours.
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ