netdev - Re: odd RTL8139 quirk.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:32:40 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: odd RTL8139 quirk.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:04:06 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:

> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >  > Dave Jones wrote:
> >  > > I've just been playing with a model 2 OQO, which has an RTL8139.
> >  > > It gets detected just fine, though it doesn't actually work..
> >  > > 
> >  > > eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xf8830000, 00:00:00:00:00:00, IRQ 18
> >  > > eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139'
> >  > > 
> >  > > The null MAC address being one clue.  Another oddity is that
> >  > > ethtool reports that there's no link detected, even though there is.
> >  > > (Enough for it to PXE boot a kernel from at least :)
> >  > > 
> >  > > Futzing with the debug= modparam didn't yield anything extra at all.
> >  > > 
> >  > > Any clues?
> >  > 
> >  > Sounds like a broken EEPROM.  Does supplying a MAC via ifconfig prior to 
> >  > 'ifconfig ... up' help?
> > 
> > Ah. This sounds enlightening: http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,1511.0.html
> > Seems a shame to have to choose PIO vs MMIO for a distro kernel though.
> > Would there be any objection to turning that into a modparam ?
> > (If we wanted to get really fancy, we could even quirk around it automatically
> >  when we detect broken hardware).
> 
> Something like this?  :)
> 
> http://www.linux.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00226.html
> 
> It did not go upstream but it needed some init-time bug fixing, IIRC. 
> Maybe akpm remembers more why my patch sucked... :)

Apart from its From: address you mean? ;)

I can find no record, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html