netdev - Re: odd RTL8139 quirk.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:13:48 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: odd RTL8139 quirk.

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:04:06 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Dave Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>  > Dave Jones wrote:
>>>  > > I've just been playing with a model 2 OQO, which has an RTL8139.
>>>  > > It gets detected just fine, though it doesn't actually work..
>>>  > > 
>>>  > > eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0xf8830000, 00:00:00:00:00:00, IRQ 18
>>>  > > eth0:  Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139'
>>>  > > 
>>>  > > The null MAC address being one clue.  Another oddity is that
>>>  > > ethtool reports that there's no link detected, even though there is.
>>>  > > (Enough for it to PXE boot a kernel from at least :)
>>>  > > 
>>>  > > Futzing with the debug= modparam didn't yield anything extra at all.
>>>  > > 
>>>  > > Any clues?
>>>  > 
>>>  > Sounds like a broken EEPROM.  Does supplying a MAC via ifconfig prior to 
>>>  > 'ifconfig ... up' help?
>>>
>>> Ah. This sounds enlightening: http://www.oqotalk.com/index.php/topic,1511.0.html
>>> Seems a shame to have to choose PIO vs MMIO for a distro kernel though.
>>> Would there be any objection to turning that into a modparam ?
>>> (If we wanted to get really fancy, we could even quirk around it automatically
>>>  when we detect broken hardware).
>> Something like this?  :)
>>
>> http://www.linux.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00226.html
>>
>> It did not go upstream but it needed some init-time bug fixing, IIRC. 
>> Maybe akpm remembers more why my patch sucked... :)
> 
> Apart from its From: address you mean? ;)
> 
> I can find no record, sorry.

Yeah, it was in -mm for a while (via netdev-2.6.git#ALL most likely), 
and a -mm tester reported that it consistently oops for him, or 
something along those lines.

You continually (and rightly!) pestered me about it, and I withdrew the 
patch from -mm since I didn't have time to futz with it.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html