netdev - Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2008 09:06:16 -0700
From:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	R?mi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@...phalempin.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerrit Renker wrote:
> ... but it would still be good to have. 
> [...]

Thanks, but I think I got this already from previous mails.

The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be
returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero?

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIKw342ijCOnn/RHQRAmnrAKCO0sevJbyZXNoFG12jSg1NjPC+5wCfUlyH
cLqvVRQ1gmTkkwl5JnqA9go=
=QRU/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html