lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:11:16 -0500
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	"Stephens, Allan" <allan.stephens@...driver.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, per.liden@...csson.com,
	jon.maloy@...csson.com, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: tipc: Fix oops on send prior to entering networked mode

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:44:48PM -0800, Stephens, Allan wrote:
> Hi Neil:
> 
> Good work on spotting this bug, and in tracking down the cause.  I took
> a look at your patch, but there are a couple of problems I can see with
> the approach you've taken to fix things:
> 
Thanks.  Like I mentioned in my initial post, my approach only had minimal
testing, and I'm not supprised that my approach had some rough edges.

> 1) The check you've added to send_msg() in net/tipc/socket.c will help
> prevent things from blowing up if the message sender is using an AF_MIPC
> socket from user space, but it won't help prevent a similar oops if an
> "application" uses TIPC's native API to send a message directly from
> kernel space.
> 
> 2) The other change you made to defer setting tipc_mode to TIPC_NET_MODE
> will cause problems if TIPC has to bail out during tipc_net_start()
> because of problems.  Specifically, the ensuing call to tipc_net_stop()
> won't get a chance to clean up any partial initialization that got done
> prior to the initialization problem, which could result in memory leaks.
> 
> Fortunately, I think there's a relatively easy solution.  Since TIPC
> always needs to call tipc_node_select() in order to send an off-node
> message, you should be able to add the necessary error checking there.
> I'm thinking of something along the lines of:
> 
That seems like it might be a problem in and of itself.  If the startup/shutdown
code relies on the state of the implementation, perhaps that worth cleaning up
so as to avoid a race condition.

> static inline struct tipc_node *tipc_node_select(u32 addr, u32 selector)
> {
> 	if (likely(in_own_cluster(addr)))
> 		return tipc_local_nodes ?
> tipc_local_nodes[tipc_node(addr)] : NULL;
> 	return tipc_net->zones ? tipc_node_select_next_hop(addr,
> selector) : NULL;
> }
> 
> Please give this a try and let us know how things go.
> 
I'm happy to give this a try, but I'm a bit concerned by this approach.  It
certainly seems like it will solve the problem at hand, but it doesn't seem to
address the underlying cause, which is that you can execute code paths which the
state of the implementation doesn't/shouldn't allow.  In other words, this solve
the immediate problem, but it still allows someone to try send data via tipc
before tipc is ready to send data.  It would be nice if we could deal with the
larger problem.

I'll let you know how the above patch goes.

Regards
Neil

> Regards,
> Al
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@...driver.com] 
> > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 2:41 PM
> > To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: per.liden@...csson.com; jon.maloy@...csson.com; Stephens, 
> > Allan; tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net; 
> > davem@...emloft.net; nhorman@...driver.com
> > Subject: [PATCH]: tipc: Fix oops on send prior to entering 
> > networked mode
> > 
> > Fix TIPC to disallow sending to remote addresses prior to 
> > entering NET_MODE
> > 
> > user programs can oops the kernel by sending datagrams via 
> > AF_TIPC prior to entering networked mode.  The following 
> > backtrace has been observed:
> > 
> > ID: 13459  TASK: ffff810014640040  CPU: 0   COMMAND: "tipc-client"
> > #0 [ffff81002d9a5810] crash_kexec at ffffffff800ac5b9
> > #1 [ffff81002d9a58d0] __die at ffffffff80065127
> > #2 [ffff81002d9a5910] do_page_fault at ffffffff80066da7
> > #3 [ffff81002d9a5a00] error_exit at ffffffff8005dde9 
> > [exception RIP: tipc_node_select_next_hop+90]
> > RIP: ffffffff8869d3c3  RSP: ffff81002d9a5ab8  RFLAGS: 00010202
> > RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: 0000000000000001  RCX: 0000000000000001
> > RDX: 0000000000000000  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: 0000000001001001
> > RBP: 0000000001001001   R8: 0074736575716552   R9: 0000000000000000
> > R10: ffff81003fbd0680  R11: 00000000000000c8  R12: 0000000000000008
> > R13: 0000000000000001  R14: 0000000000000001  R15: ffff810015c6ca00
> > ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
> > #4 [ffff81002d9a5ab0] tipc_node_select_next_hop at ffffffff8869d3b1
> > #5 [ffff81002d9a5ae0] tipc_link_send_sections_fast at ffffffff88698558
> > #6 [ffff81002d9a5be0] tipc_forward2port at ffffffff8869eb1d
> > #7 [ffff81002d9a5c10] tipc_send2port at ffffffff8869eb79
> > #8 [ffff81002d9a5c30] send_msg at ffffffff886a1d0b
> > #9 [ffff81002d9a5cb0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff80055261
> > RIP: 0000003cbd8d49a3  RSP: 00007fffc84e0be8  RFLAGS: 00010206
> > RAX: 000000000000002c  RBX: ffffffff8005d116  RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: 0000000000000008  RSI: 00007fffc84e0c00  RDI: 0000000000000003
> > RBP: 0000000000000000   R8: 00007fffc84e0c10   R9: 0000000000000010
> > R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000246  R12: 0000000000000000
> > R13: 00007fffc84e0d10  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: 00007fffc84e0c30
> > ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c  CS: 0033  SS: 002b
> > 
> > What happens is that, when the tipc module in inserted it 
> > enters a standalone node mode in which communication to its 
> > own address is allowed <0.0.0> but not to other addresses, 
> > since the appropriate data structures have not been allocated 
> > yet (specifically the tipc_net pointer).  There is nothing 
> > stopping a client from trying to send such a message however, 
> > and if that happens, we attempt to dereference tipc_net.zones 
> > while the pointer is still NULL, and explode.  The fix is to 
> > add a check at the start of the send_msg path to ensure that 
> > we've allocated the tipc_net pointers and entered networked 
> > mode prior to allowing a send to any destination other than 
> > our loopback address.
> > 
> > This patch has received minimal testing, but fixes the issue. 
> >  Through reviews are appreciated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> > 
> > CC: Per Liden <per.liden@...csson.com>
> > CC: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
> > CC: Allan Stephens <allan.stephens@...driver.com>
> > CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > CC: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> > CC: tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > 
> > 
> >  net.c    |    2 +-
> >  socket.c |    4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/tipc/net.c b/net/tipc/net.c index 
> > 7906608..512b33c 100644
> > --- a/net/tipc/net.c
> > +++ b/net/tipc/net.c
> > @@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ int tipc_net_start(u32 addr)
> >  	tipc_cfg_stop();
> >  
> >  	tipc_own_addr = addr;
> > -	tipc_mode = TIPC_NET_MODE;
> >  	tipc_named_reinit();
> >  	tipc_port_reinit();
> >  
> > @@ -289,6 +288,7 @@ int tipc_net_start(u32 addr)
> >  		return res;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	tipc_mode = TIPC_NET_MODE;
> >  	tipc_k_signal((Handler)tipc_subscr_start, 0);
> >  	tipc_k_signal((Handler)tipc_cfg_init, 0);
> >  
> > diff --git a/net/tipc/socket.c b/net/tipc/socket.c index 
> > 1ea64f0..45229fd 100644
> > --- a/net/tipc/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
> > @@ -526,6 +526,10 @@ static int send_msg(struct kiocb *iocb, 
> > struct socket *sock,
> >  	if (iocb)
> >  		lock_sock(sk);
> >  
> > +	if ((tipc_mode != TIPC_NET_MODE) &&
> > +	    (dest->addr.name.domain != tipc_own_addr))
> > +		return -EHOSTUNREACH;
> > +
> >  	needs_conn = (sock->state != SS_READY);
> >  	if (unlikely(needs_conn)) {
> >  		if (sock->state == SS_LISTENING) {
> > 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ