netdev - Re: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 18:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:01:22 -0700

> +s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	s32 ret_val;
> +
> +	ret_val = igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
> +
> +	return ret_val;
> +}

Please, this is just unnecessary syntactic masterbation, simplify this
to:

s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
{
	return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
}

And:

> +void igb_release_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> +{
> +
> +	igb_release_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
> +}

Please get rid of that unnecessary empty line.

I can really tell when someone is extremely careless when removing
their debugging code, and I can almost guarentee that's what has
happened here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html