netdev - Re: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2012 16:02:37 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 2/2] igb: Add Support for new i210/i211 devices.

On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 18:27 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:01:22 -0700
> 
> > +s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +	s32 ret_val;
> > +
> > +	ret_val = igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
> > +
> > +	return ret_val;
> > +}
> 
> Please, this is just unnecessary syntactic masterbation, simplify this
> to:
> 
> s32 igb_acquire_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> {
> 	return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
> }
> 
> And:
> 
> > +void igb_release_nvm_i210(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +
> > +	igb_release_swfw_sync_i210(hw, E1000_SWFW_EEP_SM);
> > +}
> 
> Please get rid of that unnecessary empty line.
> 
> I can really tell when someone is extremely careless when removing
> their debugging code, and I can almost guarentee that's what has
> happened here.

Dave,

I get this cleaned up for Carolyn.  I will wait to re-submit till later
tonight to ensure that there is no other feedback or comments that need
to be addressed.

Cheers,
Jeff

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)