netdev - Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:21:23 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 5/8] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr

On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 20:27:26 +0800
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 06:28 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > 
> > My question is a bit more fundamental: Why are you using this new union
> > in your patches instead of simply passing around "struct sockaddr"
> > pointers? If you did that, then you could simply replace all of the
> > rpc_* wrappers with your generic ones, since you wouldn't need to do
> > the cast to this (seemingly unnecessary) union.
> 
> Because there are some places have to interpret the structure, without
> this union, they need to cast to either sockaddr_in or sockaddr_in6
> first, which is not as pretty as using a union.
> 
> For example, the code in netpoll:
> 
> ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &np->local_ip.sin6.sin6_addr)
> 
> without the union, it would be:
> 
> struct sockaddr_in6 *addr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &np->local_ip;
> ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, addr->sin6_addr);
> 
> > 
> > FWIW, I too am happy to see these routines moved to common code. I just
> > wonder whether it might make more sense to use the existing convention
> > instead of this new union.
> > 
> 

Ok, good point. That does look cleaner. I'd still like to see the rpc_*
wrappers go away, but that can be done later.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html