netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge netfilter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:47:23 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	azhou@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge
 netfilter

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:13:56PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> 
> > I'm preparing a new net-next batch, I can quickly take these three if
> > you agree:
> > 
> > 1/8 bridge: move mac header copying into br_netfilter
> > 2/8 netfilter: bridge: move nf_bridge_update_protocol to where its used
> > 4/8 netfilter: bridge: refactor conditional in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
> 
> Sure.  I can then submit the entire series (i.e. part1 without these 3
> plus part2).  I have no further br netfilter changes after that.
> 
> > Regarding 3/8, I think we can move that code to br_netfilter.c so we
> > reduce ifdef pollution a bit and keep as much of this monster code
> > fenced under that file. Please, see patch attached.
> 
> Sure.

OK, I'll push these four small changes in the follow nf-next pull
request then, so you and Andry can sort out this. Thanks Florian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html