netdev - Re: regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:34:58 +0100
From:	William Dauchy <william@...di.net>
To:	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Cc:	William Dauchy <william@...di.net>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Schmitt, Phillip J" <phillip.j.schmitt@...el.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch

On Nov11 20:33, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> If the diff above is the patch you are referring to then you will break the
> SFP+ detection in the case where the driver was loaded while there were no
> SFP+ modules present in the cages.

understood, I was surprised of the modification of behavior. 
-- 
William

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)