[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:09:54 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: William Dauchy <william@...di.net>,
"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Schmitt, Phillip J" <phillip.j.schmitt@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch
On 11/11/2015 01:34 PM, William Dauchy wrote:
> On Nov11 20:33, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
>> If the diff above is the patch you are referring to then you will break the
>> SFP+ detection in the case where the driver was loaded while there were no
>> SFP+ modules present in the cages.
> understood, I was surprised of the modification of behavior.
You might try testing against net-next to see if the problem still
exists. It looks like the code in question doesn't exist upstream as it
was replaced in commit 45788d2af928 ("ixgbe: fix issue with sfp events
with new X550 devices").
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists