[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:58:21 +0200
From: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 04/10] net/act_skbedit: Utility functions for
mark action
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:48:40AM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me> wrote:
> > +static inline bool is_tcf_skbedit_mark(const struct tc_action *a)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > + if (a->ops && a->ops->type == TCA_ACT_SKBEDIT)
> > + return to_skbedit(a)->flags == SKBEDIT_F_MARK;
>
>
> You mean to_skbedit(a)->flags & SKBEDIT_F_MARK ?
I will add a comment in v3 - it is on purpose. The function return true
iff the function is mark - other actions should not be offloaded.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists