netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 05/10] bnxt_en: Fix ethtool -l|-L inconsistent channel counts.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:33:23 +0000
From:   "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 05/10] bnxt_en: Fix ethtool -l|-L inconsistent
 channel counts.

> The existing code is inconsistent in reporting and accepting the combined
> channel count.  bnxt_get_channels() reports maximum combined as the
> maximum rx count.  bnxt_set_channels() accepts combined count that cannot be
> bigger than max rx or max tx.
> 
> For example, if max rx = 2 and max tx = 1, we report max supported combined to
> be 2.  But if the user tries to set combined to 2, it will fail because 2 is bigger
> than max tx which is 1.
> 
> Fix the code to be consistent.  Max allowed combined = max(max_rx, max_tx).
> We will accept a combined channel count <= max(max_rx, max_tx).

Don't you mean the 'max allowed combined = min(max_rx, max_tx)'.
How does using 'max' change the faulty scenario you've described?