netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tools: bpftool: optionally show filenames of pinned objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:37:39 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tools: bpftool: optionally show filenames
 of pinned objects

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 11:54:20 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > @@ -265,6 +266,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >  		{ "help",	no_argument,	NULL,	'h' },
> >  		{ "pretty",	no_argument,	NULL,	'p' },
> >  		{ "version",	no_argument,	NULL,	'V' },
> > +		{ "pinned",	no_argument,	NULL,	'l' },  
> 
> “l” is not especially easy to remember for “pinned”, but I don't see a
> good alternative, so fine by me (uppercase “P” may not make things any
> better I suppose).

Since -p is taken maybe something to do with bpffs instead of pinned?
--bpffs | -b or -f?