bugtraq - Re: Buffer overflow prevention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308160216320.21559-100000@gsu.linux.org.tr>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 02:31:33 +0300 (EEST)
From: noir <noir@....linux.org.tr>
To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@....openbsd.org>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow prevention

> 
> If we had been aware of PAX as you claim, why would we have thought
> that i386 solutions were impossible?

because of POSIX compliance obsesions ?  or incompetiance ? 
you name it.

> 
> There is only one thing I have found the various PAX people to have in
> common; they are very persistant at calling other people liars.  Can
> you people please grow up?
> 

i have no affiliation with the PAX or grsec team other than being a user 
of it. please do not make assumptions.
PAX people ? what is that supposed to mean ? it is only OpenBSD "people" 
that are into cultism. i guess you be the fake jesus ? please grow up and 
leave your fanatical ways behind. 

- noir

a good poet once said: netbsd with bunch of strlcpy ...