bugtraq - Re: [PAPER] Juggling with packets: floating data storage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:54:18 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: bugout@...uddancer.com
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, secpapers@...urityfocus.com,
   vulnwatch@...nwatch.org, vulndiscuss@...nwatch.org,
   full-disclosure@...sys.com
Subject: Re: [PAPER] Juggling with packets: floating data storage

On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:31:02 PDT, Aron Nimzovitch said:

> RAM with a marginal power supply.  Delay line storage has been around
> for a long time, if it was useful, it would be commerical.

Which is why the pharmeceutical companies got special tax breaks for
developing "orphan drugs" that treat diseases that only a handful of
people get, to keep the cost of R&D down so the people could AFFORD
the drugs, right?

For it to be commercial, it needs to be both useful *and* have a sufficiently
large target audience to support a business.  If your fixed costs are $1M,
and the marginal costs are $20/item, the economics work out a LOT differently
for 100K customers and for 100 customers. (Do the math yourself if you don't
believe me...)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped