bugtraq - Re: Edonkey/Overnet Plugins capable of Virus/Worm behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031218103201.18322.qmail@sf-www1-symnsj.securityfocus.com>
Date: 18 Dec 2003 10:32:01 -0000
From: Julian Ashton <ashton@...tmedia.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Edonkey/Overnet Plugins capable of Virus/Worm behavior

In-Reply-To: <20031217225422.GA13131@...uoregon.edu>

I am concearned that this is a P2P app with over 1.2 million simulatneous users and that anyone can write a plugin and put it on the network, the plugin CAN self propgate and CAN force overnet/edonkey to perform DDOS attacks. But where is the security that I am looking for? The owners "MetaMachine", I think that all plugins should required to be signed by MetaMachine and checked when loaded. Am I asking too much? I do not want to see this network become a mode of virus propogation.