lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200411110247.iAB2ldc28110@netsys.com> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:46:41 -0500 From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry@...ryseltzer.com> To: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>, <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Subject: RE: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked Why would anyone place any credibility in exit polls? They were wildly inaccurate in 2000 as well, and they didn't have a great reputation before that. In blue states too. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Kramer Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:47 PM To: dottom@...il.com; bugtraq@...urityfocus.com; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked Tom Le <dottom@...il.com> may have written:- >In fact, Repubs leaked their exit poll numbers early for Florida and >Ohio before the counts had come in and they were extremely accurate. > It seems to me that whats being postulated is that somehow the Republicans rigged the result in Florida and that the evidence for this are discrepencies between exit polls and the final result. But you are saying the Republicans exit polls matched the final result. I wonder what William of Occam would make of this? :) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists