lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <41A25D25.2090801@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:41:57 -0500 From: bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> Cc: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@...zio.com>, Jason Coombs <jasonc@...ence.org>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida Paul Schmehl wrote: > I disagree. Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating > is premature. Many people don't seem to understand, investigating > supposed discrepancies in the vote costs millions of dollars. The > recount in Ohio will cost the state $1.5 million. That's money that > could pay for other things. So you don't run off on wild goose chases > just because some "researcher" says, "Oooooo, look at this. This > looks really unusual." > You do realize that some people consider investigation and research to be connected and that, if there is any implication of a problem (whether the all-knowing creationist agrees or not) that that problem should be "looked into" (does that better suit your vocabulary?).... So, what you're really saying is that you're not willing to back an investigation until an investigation is done which shows that an investigation is warranted, correct? Well, of course you'd believe that! It's politically expediant for you. :) -Barry _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists