bugtraq - Re: Dangers of discarding duplicated messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502182129270.6461@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:31:42 -0500 (EST)
From: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@...ringpenguin.com>
To: Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@...tysiak.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Dangers of discarding duplicated messages

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:

> Developers: Consider using checksum of the email messages, not only the
>             Message-ID to distinguish between duplicated messages.

We have a product that needs to detect duplicate messages (retransmissions
in the face of temporary SMTP failures.)  Obviously, we'd never use
the Message-ID for this.  Less obviously, you can't always use a hash
because some mailers actually change the message body on each retransmission!

For example, Lotus Domino appears to store the e-mail in some internal
format, and generates a new MIME message on each retransmission.  Each
generated message has different MIME boundary delimiters.

So we have to calculate a "modified" hash and ignore bits of the message
that mutate.

--
David.