bugtraq - Re: Announcement: The Web Application Firewall Evaluation Criteria v1 Released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43D329BD.6080108@linuxbox.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:44:13 +0200
From: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Announcement: The Web Application Firewall Evaluation Criteria
 v1 Released


contact@...appsec.org wrote:
> The Web Application Firewall Evaluation Criteria project is proud
> to announce v1.0 of The Web Application Firewall Evaluation Criteria
> (WAFEC), its first official release.
> 
> WAFEC is a result of a collaboration between web application
> firewall vendors and independent security professionals to create a
> comprehensive, vendor-neutral, web application firewall evaluation
> criteria. The resulting framework can be used to evaluate and
> and compare web application firewalls.
> 
> WAFEC v1.0 can be downloaded from the project home page:
> 
>   http://www.webappsec.org/projects/wafec/

Having a good framework by which to judge these applications is very 
cool as I had to do without quite a few times before. Thanks for 
creating it.

It is my belief that *today's* web application firewalls are a waste of 
money. Some people disagree and as I respect them, I will answer their 
questions one by one.

This is pretty long, check out:
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/220

And the follow-up, answering questions and good arguments: 
http://blogs.securiteam.com/?p=237

I'd appreciate any input.

	Gadi.