bugtraq - Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3fa8d0b0602182207l78fce99eqcf2c38e9cae85e42@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:07:45 -0600
From: FocusHacks <focushacks@...il.com>
To: "Anthony Cicalla" <Anthony.Cicalla@...kserv.com>
Cc: "self-destruction@...best.com" <self-destruction@...best.com>,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Vulnerabilites in new laws on computer hacking


http://www.pulltheplug.org/wargames/index.html

http://dusty.b33r.net/wargames.php

There are already dozens, perhaps hundreds of these sites out there,
if you know how to use a search engine.  "Hacking contests", "hacking
wargames", etc.

"King of the hill" type war-games are where the person who roots the
box owns the box and tries to keep everyone else from rooting it
(however, deleting user accounts or making it impossible to log in is
usually disqualification)

Why this discussion is even on Bugtraq boggles my mind.  This is
perhaps Security-Basics fodder.

On 2/15/06, Anthony Cicalla <Anthony.Cicalla@...kserv.com> wrote:
> ...  Maybe a
> sponsored couple of sites to teach this and be legal targets for script
> kiddies. Just some of my thoughts on the matter. After saying this I don't
> support illegal activities but if we want the kids to learn and not go to
> jail  for being curious then we as a community need to look at this and
> provide a positive outlet for this type of activity.
>