[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602221316090.8543@lariatasp>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:32:21 -0700 (MST)
From: "Benjamin R. Ginter" <bginter@...vtech.net>
To: Matt Van Gundy <matt@...kinahstudios.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Injection Vulnerabilities in PHP PEAR::Auth Module
Thanks for the advisory.
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why you did not specify which
backends are vulnerable?
Yeah, I can go dig it up (and will) but the advisory would have been far
more useful if it included the list of vulnerable backends; end users
could know at a glance if they _need_ to upgrade.
Thanks again,
Ben
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Matt Van Gundy wrote:
> PRODUCT:
> PEAR::Auth Authentication Module Package
> http://pear.php.net/package/Auth
>
> VERSIONS AFFECTED:
> All versions < 1.2.4
> 1.3 series < 1.3.0r4
>
> DESCRIPTION:
> Some of the PEAR::Auth Container back ends do not fully validate
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists